Discussion Post #1

I believe that some of the parts of the constution is outdated, but the majority is still valid today. Our constution is over 200 years old and still is fairly efficient. No other country comes even close to that. I think that eventually it might need some revisions but currently it is fine as it is. I think the most important parts of the constution is The freedoms that we have as a resualt of the bill of rights. This is because we all excercise these rights every single day of our lives and we dont even know or realize it.

Alex A. Per 5

I believe that the constitution is still valid to this day. The constitution itself should stay how it is but if revisions are needed, then thats what amendments are for. We already have the bill of rights and other amendments that give us new freedoms and specifics that might not have been clear in the original text. If, in the future, there is need for a change to the constitution because part of it does not apply to that time era, we can change it.

Alex A. Per 5

I also agree with T McMackin. There were some parts of the constitution that are outdated. Like, in the time of the 1920's, prohibition was the new thinking of some. They believed that the selling of alcohol should be illegal although it was protected under the constitution. So eventually it was put into the list of amendments to ban the selling of alcohol. After a while the people of america did not like this, sales still continued "underground", so the constitution was changed yet again to where it was allowed that we could sell alcoholic beverages.

The Constitution is kind of out dated because it was made like over 100 or more years ago. I think that its fine as it is unless there is something that is really out of date and does not have to do with the year now. I think that there should be nothing added to the Constitutiong. The most important principles outlined in the Constitution would be, what I think, how each level of government is splited up and which part of the government gets what thing to be responsible for.

Alex A. Per. 5

Although the constitution is old, it still has validity, Ursula. The constitution does separate the different branches of government but also outlines a lot of different powers of that the government has verses the state government and the people. It also provides guideline for the country and how it must be run. If portions of the document are out dated, we can amend it and add to it to better fit our nation now.

Although the constitution is old I do not find it outdated. There are minimal parts, however that I find need to be fixed. For example, I do not feel that the framers of the constitution intended for the right to bear arms to encompass a 50 caliber rifle. In the early years of our country the people were worried that the government might become corrupt, so they allowed citizens the right to bear arms so an army of citizens would have the ability to assemble and protect themselves. I have no issues with American citizens bearing arms, I simply feel that certain limitations should be set on which types of guns can be purchased by civilians. Guns such as the 50 caliber are created to obliterate objects, going far beyond the standard intention to kill. Guns like these with such substantial range and power should not be legal to purchase by just anyone. These ponits aside, I find the constitution extremely efficient in protecting our rights and creating a system of government which vastly surpasses others throughout the world. If there are any serious issues that arise in our system we can amend them to better fit our country today. The most important principles outlined in the constitution are the citizens rights to vote for their representation and our freedoms of press, speech, and religion because it allows for the true needs of the people to be more easily met.

The Constitution, I think, is a very powerful document. It delineates the different brances of our government, explains the purpose of each branch, the two houses, and tells you requirements of each position. The Constition helps people understand what goes on in the government; things they can and can not do. I like it just the way it is! If there needs to be changes make a Constitution Part 2!!

I agree with T McMackin. Many Americans do not realize how lucky they are to live in a country where everyone is allowed to express themselves how they choose to live their lives. There are opportunities in this country that other people will stop at nothing to get. In some countries if you speak out against the government you can be killed. This country has so many freedoms that we would only miss if we did not have them.

Our Constitution written in 1776 is the foundation in which our laws are based upon. Yes, some aspects of our Constitution are outdated, yet being written over 200 years ago, it has done us well. No matter what we as people do, nothing is perfect, and even with changing little excerpts from our Constitution, somehow someone will find a way to use it to protect them from the law. What is the use of changing our Constitution? I believe that changes within our Constitution will only take away our rights and once our government takes one thing away within our Constitution, another will go and so forth, slowly allowing our government to assume they can take everything we have. Freedom we have toward ourselves is one principle in this Constitution that is important to many Americans today. Many may not realize but this Constitution protects us from our government, for example, the Right to Bear Arms, without this our government can easily take us over with a flick of an eye.

The Constitution is still valid up to this day. It cannot stay the same forever. Revision and changes might be needed in the future. As we progress into the future, situation changes and so does the Constitution. Eventually, we will need to change it to fit our needs. The only thing that should be added to the Constitution is the inclusion of popular vote as a part of presidential election instead of just the electoral vote. I think the most important principle in the Constitution is the stability of our government because it is set to be strong and balanced.

I disagree with Alexa B. I think we all should have the right to choose for ourselves whether to choose to be evil or to be good. We shouldn't be limited of our right to not be incapable of choosing whether or not we can do this or that. It's true that destructive weapons can be dangerous, but it's not satisfying to be restricted to certain conditions. Rights to bear arm and even little things such as buying or owning certain things such as video games, credit card , cigars, alcohols, etc. should not be limited by age and social status because we should be able to choose what is good and what is bad for ourselves. Every action has consequences and that should be enough for us to make a decision.

In my opinion, The Constitution is not outdated. If the need to change something arises, we can simply amend it. However, I think that we should change several parts of it. For example, the right to bear arms enables us to carry guns for defense; but I think that it should be limited on what we are allowed to buy/carry because I dislike the idea that anyone can buy a .50 caliber rifle. I think that we should add several restrictions on some of our rights; such as the right to bear arms, because too much freedom can also be a bad idea. The most important principles outlined in The Constitution are: the right of citizens to vote, the way the government is divided and how each branch oversees another so that one cannot be more powerful than the rest, and the freedom of speech, religion, and press.

I disagree with Sean S. While we may know how to decide whether what we do is good or bad, It still does not mean that we can have the freedom to choose what we want. Knowing what is good and what is bad is very different from knowing what is responsible and irresponsible. It may not be very satisfying for us to be limited on several of our rights, but it has to be done; I do not think that we are all irresponsible, I am just saying, restrictions are there for a reason, which is to keep us safe.

Janet S. period 1
I think Alexa B. makes some good points. The constitution is a little out dated, well not really out dated but some things should be changed! I think back then, when they were putting this in affect, they werent thinking about how advanced these guns can get. And i dont think just any body should be able to purchase these guns. I think there needs to be some kinda of limit or some kind of ristrictions with the right to bear arms. The video in class that we watched is a prime example of why not just any one should be able to purchase these big guns. I think that man was a physco and took advantage of the second ammendment!

For the most part the constition is still relevant, there a couple of minor things that could be changed. And the most important part about the Constition, are our rights as citizens.

Ha that sean s. guy cracks me up, i think some things need to change ha but not all that, i think there are limitations for a reason, im sure you think that your mature and you think you should be able to purchase those things, but if there wasnt an age limit or if we were able to make our own decisions.The world would be even crazier than what it is now!

First off T McMackin you have no clue as to what you're even saying. Fairly efficient ok first off it is completly efficient. The constitution was set up how it was for a reason vague, so that still today over 200 years later were still using the same one. Yes the constitution had some rough times but small parts were revised and edited so that it fits well in today's society. I don't think anything should be changed or added for the time being becuase there is no situation that is so important to do so. I think the most important principal is the right to bear arms without this sort of defense our country would be like every other country it just sets the U.S. apart from everyone else.

I the the constittion is set up in a great order but there are just little itty bitty things on the constition that could possibly change becuase in some court cases people can get off scotch free becuase they found a loop hole in the constition such as the burgulars who are sewing people for hurting them selfs on other peoples properties. But other then just loop holes for bad people it is also made for the people and to help the people in many ways such as in the ohio vs. that lady with the pornography. other then that in my own opinion i do beleive the constition is out dated only in som parts talking about the millitia and what not.
i think T.J. P is obviouly confused and is lost on the hole point that the constitoin is perfect for america and has no imperfections but i do agree with him that nothing should be done to change it becuase their is no court case big enought to have to change laws of the constition.

The Constitution as a whole does not seem outdated, but there are some particular aspects that seem so. The language seems very different than the language we use now, but the meanings will always stay the same. It is an amazing foundation to this country, and does not need considerable change. As of now, I do not think the Constitution needs to change at all, but since it has that ability to change, I believe that at one time or another, some parts may need change. The majority of the Constitution has remained the same so long because human nature typically stays the same over time, but there are new technologies, issues, and knowledges that could cause a change to it in the future. The most important part of the Constitution is how it completely sets up our government, and ensures us freedoms like speech and religion, and treats everyone equally and fairly.

Shannon, I liked how you said the Constitution was used to protect us from the goverment itself. I think the Constitution structured our government in such a way with its checks and balances of different branches that the government will not become too powerful or control us. I do not think that changing it would slowly take away our rights though. I think it has done well and needs no change as of now, but the way that change comes seems fairly difficult. Since it is difficult, changes that do come would probably come with good reason.

K. Kundrath Hour 1

I think that the constitution should stay valid. Although I do think that there should be limits on sometof the amendments. For example, the second amendment stating that everyone has the right to bear arms. For obvious reason such as military reasons and self defense. I do not like the fact that anyone who is of age can buy any gun, and now a days it just seems like they buy it just because they can. Some of the most important principle outlines I think are: citizens have the right to vote and freedom of speech. Everyone has an opinion and should have the right to state it.

Ryan Kordys
Period 6

I believe the constitution should stay the same as its always been. This country started with this documents as its origins and might I add we're probably the most righteous country in the world, we even invented the lightning rod to protect our homes (Benjamin Franklin). If we have survived over 200 years with this document as our general laws, then we can go on longer without changes being made. Sure some people might say changes need to be made, but this very document is what sculpted and made this country what it is to this day. I believe the most important part of the constitution is the right to bear arms. This makes America the most awesome and powerful country every, no one should mess with us or anyone who's over 18.

K. Kundrath Hour 1

I agree with Hans L. that how the concstitution isn't a outdated too muh. Also, how that later on somethings will eventually change, just like everything else in the world. Do I think it needs to be changed, no, because it's been the same and fine for several years now. Hans does have some good points, and have some of the same ideas.

- I have a belief that some parts of the constitution now is invalid for our society, but my reason is not because it is simply "outdated" or "old". Our society has changed compared to how it used to be when it was formed, and so it doesn't work the same way it used to when the constitution was made. People now have a higher will to create loopholes, get away with murder, conduct power [Not that they didn't then, BUT...] rather than actually say 'BE FREE!' to Be Free.

- The only massive problem with changing the constitution is that changing it could actually take away our freedom more than we realize. What could seem like it's 'granting more freedom' to one person could actually be 'taking away' from another, and so it'd probably be better to not change it at all; for the safety and better of everyone. - I simply have a fear that whoever would change it would not be doing it for the 'freedom' of the people, but for the gradual 'control' which appears to be slowly but surely occurring over our 'free' country.

I think the Constitution does need to be updates. It is out of date due to our constantly changing society. People can get away with rediculous things because the constitution is not up to date, so they find ways around the amendments. I think the constitution should be the same but altered slightly to have the same affect today it did when first written. I do not thing anything should be added because they have covered everything of importance already.

After reading the Constitution, I believe that some clauses of the constitution are outdated, but i do not believe that the whole constitution is outdated. Definately, the constitution needs some changes because we no longer support to pay for slave trades in the states anymore, our census keeps changing so we must keep updating the census, and etc. We can not help but feel that the constitution is outdated sometimes because we live in such a radical generation where things are changing at a fast pace, however, for now , I believe that the constitution does not need any more added things since we have the bill of rights now. Also the most important principles outlined in the constitution is the issue of the freedoms of us as the people and the powers of the governement. We must realize that our forefathers did their best to try to balance their powers to protect and serve and our freedom.

I have to agree with Hans L. from period 5 because as i said before, Hans agreed that we see that our generation has new issues such as abortion or homosexual rights and all other stuff. Most of the constitution will probably remain the same because as Hans said, our human nature does not change, but granted some clauses of the constitution must be changed in order to adapt to our generation. Now i see why our constitution is a living document, because it can adapt to our current situation and some clauses are allowed to be amended themselves.

Ryan Kordys
Period 6

Dylan Bradley, I think you are incorrect. "Itty bitty" isn't even a word or a politically correct phrase, you can't speak proper english therefore you are inadequetly incorrect. The burglers that found a loop hole in the constitution did the exact same thing as millionares that owned monopolies with railroad or major product manufacturing monopolies in the early 1900's. You can't change history, the constitution will remain the same as it has been for the past 2 decades.

I agree with Ryan K, stating that the Constitution should stay the same for the reason that this document has been going on for over two hundred years, and still nothing majorly outrageous has occured. As well, he is correct about our Constitution sculpting our country. Changing our Constitution is not something we should focus on. Yes, it does have outdated excerpts from the document. However, nothing is perfect, and people will get away with doing incredibly ridiculous crimes, no matter what we change within our Constituion.

In my opinion, I believe that the Constitution does not seem to be outdated. Yes of course the style of the writing has changed; however, the meaning will ultimately represent the same thing. Although the Constitution was written in 1776, it still remains to be strong for citizens; therefore, I do not think that it needs to be changed anytime soon. By changing certain aspects of the Constitution could increase the chances of changing another part of the Constitution. However, given the fact that the world is evolving, eventually it may need to be changed or laws to be added, but as for now, I think it should stay the same. The most important part of the Constitution is how it gives us our freedoms; such as, speech, religion, press, and treats everybody equally.

I believe the constitution should remain exactly the same. This is because it was written by our forefathers and many brilliant minds. The constitution was written based on many different views and ideas and portrays the freedom and idealistic views of americans. I do not believe it is outdated, however the literature is prehistoric to the 21st century and difficult to understand completely. I think the most important principles of the constitution are the 1st and and 4th amendment because the U.S. is the only country in the world that includes these rights.

I believe the constitution should remain exactly the same. This is because it was written by our forefathers and many brilliant minds. The constitution was written based on many different views and ideas and portrays the freedom and idealistic views of americans. I do not believe it is outdated, however the literature is prehistoric to the 21st century and difficult to understand completely. I think the most important principles of the constitution are the 1st and and 4th amendment because the U.S. is the only country in the world that includes these rights.

I agree with Shannon P. I like the fact that you mentioned that the Constitution protects us from the government. I think that if we decided to change the Constitution it could affect our other rights. However, I do not think that it will ultimately cause us to lose our rights completely. If we choose to change the Constitution for whatever reason in the future, then it was probably changed for a good reason.

I believe there are certainly parts of the Constitution that are outdated, but as a whole the document definitely suffices. It doesn't need to be changed as of now, but I can see a point in the future when that may become necessary. Obviously things like census have to change as population does, but things that people care about most (such as their rights) still apply today as they did when our forefathers first drafted the Constitution. Certainly new issues arrive and Amendments must be made, but for the most part state laws are enough to cover arising issues. The main principles the Constition covers are peoples' rights and the duties of the branches of government; most of that isn't subject to change any time soon. Clearly the system that's established now is pretty effective.

I believe many parts of the Constitution are still good today. Some changed may be needed due to technological advances and special circumstances, such as the right to bear arms. I think we need certain restrictions on guns that citizens should be able to own. Our rights are protected by the Constituion and allows us to have freedom and not be totally controlled by the government. This is what makes America more unique than other countries.

I agree with Ryan Kl. Our Consitution is not outdated and he makes a very good statement about how the Consitution was written by many brilliant people. Also, most of the ideas came from different people too. It should not be changed due to the fact that it has with standed over 200 year of running our nation. There have been changes made for the good; like the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is the most important part of our Consitution. It gives the people their rights, and it can be changed if necessary. This continues to change our Consitution, but i believe that it is perfect the way it was written 200 years ago.

Why should anything in our Constitution change? We've been operating under these supreme laws for so long and we're still considered the greatest country in the world so our founding fathers were obviously doing something right. I mean sure, some things are outdated like the housing of soldiers but it doesn't mean that at some point in time that someone will need to be protected by this amendment. Most importantly if one thing is changed we could possibly lose our the most important principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

I believe that the Constitution has been a valid document since it has been written and that it is still valid today or else it would have been changed in major ways. I don't think it is the Constitution itself that needs to be changed. I think that it is the people of our country that take what the document says and are either way to flexible with its laws or are too strict and thats where the people have made it seem like the Constitution needs to be changed. I think the most important principles in the Constitution are in the Bill of Rights, which allows every individual an equal opportunity to live the way a human should be allowed to live and any change to that would be almost wrong. I truly think that it is the peoples' attitudes towards the Constitution that makes it "good" or "bad"; not the document itself. On its own, I think it is a perfectly good set of laws for the States.

I'm going to have to agree with Brianna Bell, the words in the document are either studied to fiercely or taken to loosely. Why can't we have a median for governing people and the laws they HAVE to abide by. If i commit a crime am i not a bad person? so regardless of whether or not i'm a murderer, thief, or a speeder i'm still breaking the law and should be treated with the same intensity as anyone else.

Yes i believe some of the Constitution is out dated. Some of our amendment rights are altered now because of advances in technology and other things like that. The Constitution should not be changed because it is the basis of our country. It outlines how we need to run our country. Yes it is out dated in some parts but it still guides us to what our country needs to be like in order to be sucsessful.

Yes i believe some of the Constitution is out dated. Some of our amendment rights are altered now because of advances in technology and other things like that. The Constitution should not be changed because it is the basis of our country. It outlines how we need to run our country. Yes it is out dated in some parts but it still guides us to what our country needs to be like in order to be sucsessful.

Billy makes a good point that as in the housing soldiers amendment. Who are we to say that we might never need any certain law again? We don't know what the future of our country has in store. Wouldn't it be easier to just keep it the same, rather than trying to change it back to something that was cut during a time that really calls for whatever law that was? Plus why waste time on trying to change something irrelevant when you could be worrying about something more important?

I think that most of the constitution is okay, but there are a few things like the 2nd amendment that might need to be changed because of changing technology. Otherwise I think that it is fine the way it is. I'm sure that in the future things will need to be added as society changes. I think the most important principals are the right to vote, freedom of speech, and freedom of press.

First of all, we need to realize that the world has changed in the last 232 years in terms of technology, family traditions, and what is acceptable in society. However, the core values of American life has not changed since The Founding Fathers wrote the document, or at least, let's hope they have not. America was a country that was considered a melting pot with diverse cultures, fatiths, perserverance, and esstianlly leading up to an American dream. The Constitution, however "outdated" it may e should not be altered. Any change or law that needs to be added can be administered though an Amendment. Freedom is the most important right, and without it America would a socialist, facist, or communist society, similar to all the other failed governments of the world. The rights in the Constitution were instilled and successful throughout the years 272 years, making the U.S. the most powerful, successful civilization in the world's history.

I believe in some ways the constitution is out dated. However, i do not think it should be changed. I think certain exceptions should be made. For example... the right to bear arms. I do not think any citizen should be able to buy a 50 caliber rifle, which can inflict damage from up to a mile away. Our nation has greatly changed from the time of the constitution to now. New restrictions and amendments should be made, however i believe we must stick to the core principles presented in the constitution. I think the most importnat principles outlined in the constitution is the limit of powers and the outline of checks and balances. Our nation was founded upon the principal of freedom, and these laws were a necessity in keeping our government in control and from branching into a monarchy. Our systems success inspired many nations to fight for freedom as well.

First of all, we need to realize that the world has changed in the last 232 years in terms of technology, family traditions, and what is acceptable in society. However, the core values of American life has not changed since The Founding Fathers wrote the document, or at least, let's hope they have not. America was a country that was considered a melting pot with diverse cultures, fatiths, perserverance, and esstianlly leading up to an American dream. The Constitution, however "outdated" it may e should not be altered. Any change or law that needs to be added can be administered though an Amendment. Freedom is the most important right, and without it America would a socialist, facist, or communist society, similar to all the other failed governments of the world. The rights in the Constitution were instilled and successful throughout the years 272 years, making the U.S. the most powerful, successful civilization in the world's history.

Brianna brings to mind a point i didn't recognize at first, why change what works whilst ignoring what needs to be added. the Constitution, as i said before, is doing something right because our country is still operating. We have so many other things that can be done to the constitution to improve it. why change something when you can add to it to make it better?

I agree with Lindsey A because she is right on the fact that the constitution is the core of our country. Some amendments may be needed to keep up with the advances in society. But why change something that has worked for over 200 years. The Constitution is what makes this country so great and i do not see a good enough reason to change it.

I think that the constitution is not fully out of date. I think that there are certain parts that need to be changed. Due to our different living enviroment and different technology and different way of life. The constitution gives a good outline of how the country should be ran and the distribution of powers. But it needs to be a little more specific.

I think that there are some parts of the constitution that are outdated, however for the most part it is current with the times. I think the constitution is a good template of a document that can be used no matter what year it is. I think there are some things that I foresee with time are going to need to be changed with Imigration and other topics, but the constitution is a changable document and when the time comes, change will happen. I don't think there is a most important part of the constitution. The document being as short as it is doesn't give room to a more important part or a less important part.

lindsey A and Brianna Bell bring up a good point it is not the constitution itself that needs to be changed its the people who need to see that the constitution has a good structure and has run this country for over two hundred years with no problems. if anything needs to be changed it is the bill of rights not necessarily changed but added to to help ensure our freedoms with the ever expanding country

I agree with Marthony. I take apparent issue with the right to bear arms. I also agree with his statement in response to Sean. What is right and wrong and what is responisble and irresponsible are seaprate. These restrictions, like Marthony said, are there for our protection and although they may potentially be frustrating at times they tend to be beneficial. Who is to say who is fit to carry destructive weapons or not and someone who is unfit to do so may potentially put others in danger.

I believe that the Constitution may be outdated to some extent but it is strange that altough it was written a hundred years ago the same problems occur. Saying that i must say that the constitution may outdated by the words that where written but not by the thoughts that were trying to be expressed. Concerning the facts that what needs to be added or taken i think it is fine just the way that it is. Some may say that times are changing but then how come it is still effective today and was effective or a hundred year time span?

I would have to agree with Austin. He makes a good point. The Constitution is obvously still working for the US because it's functioning perfectly fine. But I think that we may change the context and just take the generarl ideas of what the Constitution says to make sure it is still valid as time goes on.

Brianna Bell makes a good point when she says that we don't know what the future brings us and changing certain laws in the Constitution at one point in time and a later finding out what we thought would never occur did is just wasting our time. Chaningig irrelevant portions of our Constitution is not worth the long and time consuming process to rid or even change our Constituion.

I agree 100% with Hannah Duncan from period 6. i think there may need to be minor changes to the constitution, but for the most part should stay the same because it is what has molded our country to what it is today. We need to remember it was written in the best intrest of the U.S. and still works for that purpose today. There may just need to be some changes made to certain amendments to make them have the same affects they did when written, and it can stop people from finding ways to use the amendments for personal gain.

I highly disagree with a comment stated by Lindsey A. I beleive every single person of 18 years of age has the right to purchase a .50 Caliber armor piercing sniper rifle. The constitution strictly says that we have the right to bear arms, and in that we should keep it that way. That is limited though, if it was the right to bear any arms then we would have 18 year old kids walking around with R.P.G.'s (Rocket Propelled Grenade Launchers) or a belt full of fragmantation or flash grenades. Be thankful that we're limited on the type of weapons we're allowed to carry or there could easily be another civil war on our hands.

I highly disagree with a comment stated by Lindsey A. I beleive every single person of 18 years of age has the right to purchase a .50 Caliber armor piercing sniper rifle. The constitution strictly says that we have the right to bear arms, and in that we should keep it that way. That is limited though, if it was the right to bear any arms then we would have 18 year old kids walking around with R.P.G.'s (Rocket Propelled Grenade Launchers) or a belt full of fragmantation or flash grenades. Be thankful that we're limited on the type of weapons we're allowed to carry or there could easily be another civil war on our hands.

I like what Shannon P. says when she says we don't know what will happen in the future. The constitution has for the most part got us through our existance as Americans. When the time comes, change will happen. Until then, the constution is fine as is.

I agree with Brianna Bell, why do we need to get rid of a law just because it is deemed irrelevant during the time? Why not add something else that is more important, rather than get rid of a law deemed useless.

I totally agree with Ryan Kordys. Everyone should have the right to own a 50 cal. I have two questions for those who don't believe so. How many murders by gun has the 50 cal produced in it's existance? What about hand guns?

Ryan i think you are right on the subject of owning fire arms. The limitations we have on the kind of guns we may own at 18 could be a lot worse. Being able to own the .50 caliber sniper is a good idea, because its a garunteed right in the Constitution. We should just be happy that we limit it as much as we do. There are way worse weapons people can get there hands on illegaly out there. That is what we should be more worried about people owning.

I disagree with Ryan's comment and would have to agree with Lindsey. I think the Constitution needs to be interpreted within reason. Why would a citizen need an extremely desructive gun? The ammendment was intended for citizens to protect themselves, not create uneeded damage.

I agree with Ryan K about being able to own a .50 Caliber Sniper Rifle at the age of 18. It falls under the category of a firearm so we should be allowed to own it. I think the limitations on explosive devices are necessary but not a gun. If we put limitations on the rights we have as Americans where will the limitations stop.

I understand what you're saying Marthony, but I don't think it makes much difference. Even if we can't get dangerous stuffs from a gun store, we can still get them illegally. Restrictions may apply but they won't stop killers from getting what they want. Besides, weapons such as 50 cal. can be used other than for shooting people. Some might buy them simply as a collection or display.

Kenny D Pr 6

I belive that the constitution is and has been going good for Americans but over time everything seems to change. When our founding fathers wrote the constitution I'm sure they planned for it to work in the futher but for how long? Small things such as enviroment and technology plays part in our daily lives, and we live our daily lives through the Constitution. Meaning I am happy with how fleixble and how the Constitution is now.

Chase, I do not think that the Constitution needs to be changed quite yet for the change in society. I agree that society has changed, but not enough to change the Constitution. I know some parts need slight changes, but if people find ways around the Constitution, I think that it would not be effective to change the Constitution. I think it would be more effective to change state laws if the Constitution does not cover a certain topic.

The constitution was intended to satisfy the people at the time and did its best to satisfy the people to come, but as people do come and go revisements in order to keep the document in tact are needed. its a document intended to keep going, and with technological advancements it must be revised in oder to do that (keep going)...its hard to say what needs to be changed but with most things there is always room for improvement.

Marcus M Pr. 6

I feel that the constitution is in many ways still valid today and can be applied to many things in the present. i don't believe that it is outdated, i believe there should be actions taken to add on new ideas to the constitution, Which will help with the more modern day problems we have. the add ons will further extend the growth of america and only prolong the spirt or our nation. i think that for most of our issues we should always try to look back to how our founding fathers would have taking care of it, and try to apply it to todays issues.

The Constitution isn't outdated. The way it organizes and restricts our government still functions today, and quite well I might add. If changes are needed in the future to accomodate the times, then amendments can be used to supplement or change the constitution from what it is now. As for now, no changes need to be made to our rights or anything else in the Constitution, everything is just fine as it is. If you allow small changes to the Constitution, they can quickly change into large ones, and end up leading to a government with too much power.

Kayla K Pd. 1

Sean, you make a good point, and I agree with you. People should be given the freedom to choose. That's the point of having rights and freedom. If you can not make decisions for yourself, what freedom do you have?

The constitution was intended for satisfying the people at the time and was meant to satify the people to come as best as it could, but with technological advancements and the country changing revisements are very necessary in order to keep stability in the government and the people. The country can not live entirely after the old ways and so as it is with most things, there is always room for improvement.

I agree with Hans L from period five. I agree with the fact that the Constitution should remain the same as for now. The Constitution has been successful for several years now. However, as he later stated, eventually over time the Constitution may need to be changed in order to meet the needs of the people. Change is simply a part of life, this is just a fact that everyone must accept sooner or later.

I think the constitution should stay the same. This country was founded on its ideas and so far it seems to be working out fine. However, with the advances in technology, the constitution will need to be changed slightly to prohibit people from buying destructive weapons.

I disagree with Ryan Kordys. I think weapons such as the .50 caliber rifle should only be used in the military. No one needs a gun so powerful. The ghetto is only so bad and with weapons like the .50 caliber rifle, shootouts will leave bodies scattered in pieces in the street.
People say that they own the gun for hunting but if you shoot a rabbit, or even a deer, there will be nothing left of it.

Period 5
Billy W is right. Our Consitution was made so that it could be relied upon for centuries into the future, Nothing about the Consituition should change, and if something should, it should be only a minor part in the consitution.

I agree with billy w and sam lee that the constituion was written to work for the future as well. The forefathers assumed that the country would grow and things would change. If something more drastic does occure, then we may have to decide what has to happen or what we may have to add to the constitution like Shannon P. said.

I agree with billy i think that they way that the founding fathers wrote the constution makes it sill vaild to this day and for days to come.

I agree with Alex A. I believe that if something needs fixing its only a single part not the entire thing. And to fix that single part Amendments can always be made to change the way that a previous Amendment functioned.

In my opinion, some of the consitution is outdated and I believe that parts of the document needs to be altered. Although, at the same time, some of it is still works very well. I think that some of our rights are not very clear- such as the second amendment. I think that the rights the people have for ownership of firearms needs to be more clearly stated in the constitution. I think that the document needs to add what exactly is allowed and isn't allowed, since there tends to be a lot of arguing over this amendment. There's always room for improvement, especially since the document was created so long ago- today's issues need to be addressed.

I disagree with Nick G. in the sense that he believes the constitution should stay the same. I do agree, however, with his statement that the constitution should be changed to prohibit our citizens from purchasing destructive weapons.

I definitely disagree with Ryan K on his comment about allowing 18 year olds to buy a .50 calliber armor piercing sniper rifle. I do not believe that any person (other than the military/ policeman, etc.) should be able to own any type of gun. I understand the whole "protection" thing and the "right to bear arms", but there are other ways available for protection. I believe any type of gun is too dangerous for any average citizen to own (especially if they don't know how to correctly use it and are not trained to use it). I believe the "right to bear arms" in the constitution should be revised, and that no one should be allowed to own any type of gun. The constitution should limit our weapon usage drastically- that way, everyone would be safer.

Kenny D pr 6

I argee with Marcus M, our founding fathers ideas refect our mondern day issues. With America growing in the number of citizens daily means the amount of american needs of being satisfied with their rights are growning as well. I'm not sure on what we may do to add or remove from the constitution but I'm still happy we are still living by it.

alex a. period 5

i would just like to take this opportunity to say go Mr. Waddell and go America.....

and yes this is a form of brown-nosing to Mr. W

i think that the constitution shouldn't change much. i believe its good the way it is except for they need to update it a bit.
if this is what controls citizens it should be looked at carefully.

I have to disagree with Caylan. It doesn't make sense for a member of the police force or military to have weapons and not the citizens. In theory that would be great, I would want that too. But you end up with is a black market of criminals buying guns and using them against people they know won't be able to protect themselves. They'll be breaking into your house and robbing you, maybe more, and you won't be able to defend yourself. I wish it wasn't necessary, but be realistic.

The founding fathers knew that the constitution would not always have the same rules for generations to come. That is why they made sure to include adding amendments to the Constitution. I do believe that the Constitution can, at times, seem to be an old piece of paper and not have any modern day meaning. But, the Constitution is more of a way to keep order in American rather than a true binding document. Without the Constitution any laws that are passed or right that are being broken would have no meaning and all would be anarchy. Some rights like protection against unlawful search and seizure seemed like a good idea at the time but now a days the rules aren't followed 100%. There is always a loophole for the government or a way around the Constitution. The most important principles that define Modern America are Freedom of Speech, Press, Petition, and Religion. Those are the basis for the founding of our great nation.

I agree with Marthiny and many other students when they say that a .50 Calibur Rifle should not be able to be carried around by a civilian. The founding fathers meant the right to bear arms as a way to protect against foreign invasion or corrupt government that disregard that Constitution and the Bill of Rights. I think many people are afraid to think about how many people carry weapons that are living right around the corner or right next door.

I disagree when people say that the Constitution shouldn't be changed. I do agree however that keeping the essential principles of the Constitution is important to keep justice and order in our country. Amendments are placed here for a reason. Times change and so do the allowances of the government, but the rights of the people will never change.

I would have to disagree and agree with what blaine had to say. The constitution does need revisement but it's not becuase it was intended just for the people of the particular time. Like i said before the constitution is vague for the specific reason that it will mold with the people of it's time. The right to bear arms is not even in issue it should just be as is. If it is so horrible why are there so few shootings out of a nation with so many people think about the ratio.

I believe the constitution is still valid to this day. If it was necessary to change it, it would have already passed through to make it necessary for one's needs. I think the constitution is so complexed that there is no need to change the and i believe thats why it has lasted for so many years.

I believe the constitution is still valid to this day. If it was necessary to change it, it would have already passed through to make it necessary for one's needs. I think the constitution is so complexed that there is no need to change the and i believe thats why it has lasted for so many years.

I believe the constitution is still valid to this day. If it was necessary to change it, it would have already passed through to make it necessary for one's needs. I think the constitution is so complexed that there is no need to change the and i believe thats why it has lasted for so many years.

I disagree with Caylan A. because for some older folks and people who might not be able to defend themselves in their homes against intruders need guns in order to protect themselves and their families.

I think that the Constitution is, for the most part, very much valid to this day. Nothing is perfect, everything has flaws, but I believe the Constitution needs no change. It has served as our law for over 200 years, and thus far has done a pretty good job. In my opinion, nothing needs to be added, it will only create problems. Regardless of what anyone says or thinks, we still have all of our rights unless we break laws, that is the most important thing.

I would have to agree with T.J on this one, I think that the constitution fits very good in today's society. We might think that it needs to be changed, but this document has held us together for over 200 years and it also is the govt. that made us the leading power in the world. Some people might not think that its very politically correct anymore, but to be honest those rights that it gives us are what this country was founded on and is all about so by changing it changing the integrity of our country. One of the most important parts to the constitution is the right to bear arms, this is the land of the free and the home of the brave, and you don't get to be there without a fight. You also have to be able to protect what you have if you want to stay at the top and that is exactly what this right gives us.

I don't think the constitution is outdated but it could have some minor changes here and there but I think that the current day society has changed enough to the point where the constitutuion should be changed all too much. The most important things in the constitution are the rights of the people.

I agree with Mr. McMackin, yes the majority of the constitution is valid to this day as it was writen over 200 years ago. No other country does compare but they aren't all governed the same and don't want that kind of power in the peoples hands as we do in the U.S. so it really isn't the same concept in other countries and isn't relevant. The Bill of Rights is indeed the most important thing in the constitution because we do use them to the full extent, and sometimes push the limit but the fact that we have the rights is what keeps this country running the way it does.

I agree with Mr. McMackin, yes the majority of the constitution is valid to this day as it was writen over 200 years ago. No other country does compare but they aren't all governed the same and don't want that kind of power in the peoples hands as we do in the U.S. so it really isn't the same concept in other countries and isn't relevant. The Bill of Rights is indeed the most important thing in the constitution because we do use them to the full extent, and sometimes push the limit but the fact that we have the rights is what keeps this country running the way it does.

i don't see why owning guns would be such a big issue, though i do understand everyone's concern for owning a .50 caliber sniper rifle. But i say until the day there is an incident why not let them own the gun. the video we watched said that there is yet to be a murder or robbery with this gun. plus, anyone rich enough to afford a gun that expensive shouldnt need to rob a bank.

exactly. although guns are a very serious weapon and are very life threatening if used in a manner to be so, what is the big deal? no- there has not been a domestic incident with the .50 cal gun. its not like you can't compare owning guns to owning cars or any other type of toy. you can't blame anyone for being an enthusiast with firearms. I know people who collect guns for sheer enjoyment and to be able to show them off. To be able to shoot a gun and master each type is an accomplishment to them. Im sorry but if anyone has ever been shooting and has had multiple guns to choose from, it seems that many times you choose the one that has more power, the ones that look sicker, and the ones you can be more precise with-(hence the sniper rifles). And maybe thats just a redneck thing but I know that its fun when you can blow a hole through a target. I would love to be able to try out a .50 cal just to do it. I mean, no, the world would not end if they did ban the gun but it would be a little disappointing to those who want to shoot a target with a gun like that. All im saying is, being able to own the gun with those capabilities is the kind of freedom that so many people take for granted. And if someone's going to kill someone with that gun, what is the difference between that rifle and a pocket knife. Yes it may look like a gruesome death but YOURE GOING TO DIE ANYWAY. If a freak wants to kill a lot of people, they're going to make sure they get the job done. so if you want to prevent people from getting away with murder with guns like that, just make a law of required registration.

thank you billy. there has been no incidents with these guns so there is no need to worry about them. Im not ignorant to the fact that the .50 cal is an extremely hazardous and lethal firearm. but seriously, how much different is it to own a gun like that or to have the biggest, baddest car you can buy. Everyone knows there is NO reasonable purpose for buying a car like that except for the sheer thrill you get riding in it and the ability to show it off to everyone. You could argue with me that-oh well, a car isn't going to practically vaporize a person. No it won't, but a killer, or even a terrorist could just as well use that car to kill pedestrians. Nobody said terrorists have to use big guns or bombs to kill people. Back to the gun. I know plenty of people who collect guns. They have showrooms, shooting ranges at their house-they love guns. Its how they were raised. They shoot for the enjoyment of shooting. They have plenty of guns that could be extremely deadly also. But they aren't idiots and the guns are in the hands of the right people. Now, if anyone has ever been shooting and has had a choice of many guns, most often, you end up wanting to shoot the most powerful(to see what you can blow a hole through), the sickest looking(usually big or more dangerous), and hello, the one you can aim the best and get the most precise shots(hence the sniper rifle). Admit it, it would be awesome to shoot one of those .50 cals. To not allow the public to be able to use those guns would not be the end of the world, but it would be quite disappointing. Its like the government doesn't trust us with those guns so we have to forbid them from ever being used. Maybe if they were a little more strict with profiling terrorists and keeping criminals from obtaining weapons,which by the way is impossible to do all of that, then would it be so bad? REALLY-being able to own and use a gun like that is the kind of freedom that so many people take for granted. All i say is just make a law of required registration and you could at least track who owns the guns. But still, bad people get their way and whether you are shot with a .50 cal or you are stabbed with a plastic knife.- oh yeah? well being shot with a .50 cal is way worse than being stabbed. its more grotesque.!- possibly, yes, but THEY WANT TO KILL YOU AND YOU ARE GOING TO DIE ANYWAY! there is no other option for a murderer or terrorist.

the second one is better. im sorry my computer is retarded and it said the first of the two comments was not submitted, so i tried to rewrite what i had said before. so now you get 2 versions haha!

Kayla K. pd. 1

Brianna I couldn't agree with you more. If there are people who want to commit murder they are going to find way to do it one way or another. I also agree that our freedom to purchase and own a .50 caliber gun is a great example of our freedoms. It is unfortunate so many Americans take them for granted.

I guess i didn't fully understand that we had to post in this blog before Sept. 8 but i will post my opinion nonetheless

I believe that the constitution was enacted for a greater purpose. A document that binds our nation together and grips it tight with balance and prestige. It keeps our nation together and it protects our many freedoms. We as a nation are very lucky to have these freedoms. The Constitution protect us from unfair treatment and it is unfortunate that people would take this freedom for granted (Like Kayla K. said in the previous response). It would be sad to see this great Constitution tarnished so rapidily because of one small negligble reason. If one law is taken away what is stopping the government from taking all our rights away. Soon we will be nation of droids following laws that used to represente what this nation is truly about...

I guess i didn't fully understand that we had to post in this blog before Sept. 8 but i will post my opinion nonetheless

I believe that the constitution was enacted for a greater purpose. A document that binds our nation together and grips it tight with balance and prestige. It keeps our nation together and it protects our many freedoms. We as a nation are very lucky to have these freedoms. The Constitution protect us from unfair treatment and it is unfortunate that people would take this freedom for granted (Like Kayla K. said in the previous response). It would be sad to see this great Constitution tarnished so rapidily because of one small negligble reason. If one law is taken away what is stopping the government from taking all our rights away. Soon we will be nation of droids following laws that used to represente what this nation is truly about...

I guess i didn't fully understand that we had to post in this blog before Sept. 8 but i will post my opinion nonetheless

I believe that the constitution was enacted for a greater purpose. A document that binds our nation together and grips it tight with balance and prestige. It keeps our nation together and it protects our many freedoms. We as a nation are very lucky to have these freedoms. The Constitution protect us from unfair treatment and it is unfortunate that people would take this freedom for granted (Like Kayla K. said in the previous response). It would be sad to see this great Constitution tarnished so rapidily because of one small negligble reason. If one law is taken away what is stopping the government from taking all our rights away. Soon we will be nation of droids following laws that used to represente what this nation is truly about...

Alex A. Period 5

way to be joey

look the constitution needs to be ripped up into a million little peices we are living our lives based on a document that was written by people that would not be able to function in society today. It doesnt make any since why would still be using it even though our founding fathers indented to make somthing new every 50 years thomas jefferson even said there needs to be a major change to government every 50 years

I feel there are many parts to the constitution that could be construed as out date but really it is just because we don’t keep a tight enough grip on the law. Many of the laws on rights should be strengthened not weakened. We are so lax in following some parts like rights to bear arms that differences arise out of confusion not law. It should be changed to be more constricting being clearly black and white, but I feel that change would not happen. In fact if the constitution would be changed it would be for the worse. Law makers would make it easier to escape the long arm of Johnny Law. So it should stay the same, out of fear of anarchy. As per what is most important in the constitution, I feel articles one through three and the bill of rights, is what truly separates us from other countries. Giving the United States a better grasp on its’ identity.

The constitution is probaly one of the only things that still keeps this country running smooth. Without the country would be in ruins and everyone's views and actions would be totaly different

I believe the constitution serves as a guidebook for how to run the country in that we shouldnt follow it line by line, but use it's general messages to run the country. Many of it's points that were true in the 19th century when it was written are not true today. For example, we have technology and with that comes a whole new breed of laws and regulations that were obviously not in the constitution, but we can use some already existing points to create new laws regarding technology.

Constitution is a pretty old piece of paper. Its pretty amazing that the consitution is still in effect today. You would think that the country would have lost its power after 200 years. I would say that the document doesn't need to be revised. And if its still in effect today and there is no major problems with it then I say we should keep it and leave it the way it is.

Mark C Pd.1

I Believe that parts of the constitution are out of date and need to be fixed or gotten rid of. In today’s society there are different issues that we have now that they founding fathers did not have then. But a majority of the constitution is correct and should not be thrown out.

The constitution is a great document which has managed to keep the US in check for numerous years but the times are changing. I believe that small "tweaks" should be made in order to accomodate the new things that have happened in the world since the actual adoption of the constitution. I am pretty sure that back then they made the constitution to fit there needs back then and didn't foresee all the changes that we have encountered. Don't mess up a good thing, just give it some minor superficial changes. (P.S. Zach should just be quiet.)

so rick do you really think that the country is running smoothly and tyler almost every other european country has a constitution just like ours they even have some form of a bill of rights so it really doesnt seperate us at all. You say that the constitution should be made more black and white but whos interpretation are they going to follow yours? see that is where problems arise. We already tried this type of government with this type of a document and guess what it leaves things to be wanted so why not change. People in america are so scared of real change yet it is going to come even if you try to stop it. It is just a matter of time

I believe the Constitution is a very important historical document, and it would be sad to see major chnages made to it. The Constitution is the basis of our countrys rules and morals and i think there should be only minor changes made to it. Like others have said, a change that should be made is the right to bear arms. I agree with Lindsey A. in the fact that someone should not be allowed to carry around a 50 caliber rifle because they are very dangerous. Back when the Constitution was created such weapons were not invented, therefor they did not have those problems. Parts that make up the Constitution, such as the Bill of Rights, hold our country together and give everyone opportunities for equality.

I believe that i have already posted on this blog but it seems to have been deleted or not posted correctly. The constitution is still a very well written document. It seems that it was made with a great amount of thought. I don't believe that it needs to be changed all that much but i'm sure some minor changes wouldn't be the end of the world. I also believe that if you allow changes to be made then the government will start changing all the rules and there will be no organized guidlines for what the government can and can not do.

I beleive that the constitution is the only thing that holds this country together. It keeps the country running smooth and is always there if there is a problem in the Country.

The constitution is still valid today, bu might need a bit of an update. As technology progresses, laws and people change, and so society will need to adapt to these changes. Antiquated laws will not be effective at governing modern people.

After reading the Constitution I feel that it is not outdated. I do not think that they should change the constitution completely, but there are some things that should be some things that should be revised. Because I feel when they were making the constitution they were not thinking about the future. They were not thinking of the advances in technology and in other things such as guns. But if there are any slight changes that needed to be made in the constitution they can just amend it. I feel that the constitution has been the same for over 200 years and it has been working just fine so why change it now?!

Zach change has happened since the dawn of time and certainly during the creation of the constitution. So it “coming” whether I like it or not is a moot point. What kind of change do you mean? Because I don’t see any problem coming in our future. True many European countries share and almost exact document as ours, so that being true, other European countries succeed. Were not a failing governmental institution, only our economic institution is failing. That happens in a free enterprise market. It’s also planned to fix its self. So I do not understand what the problem with the constitution today is.

Well the constitution is definetly outdated if we would have made no changes to it, but our society is definetly changed from when it was first written. I don't think they had people walking around with chains and gold teeth. Or even a K Mart but if they did it would be pretty cool. I wonder what they would say if they saw a mall.....lololololololol

i totally agree with jason ZEMlicka. He went and took the words right out of my mouth...

I think the constitution is what is holding this nation together. It is an amazing document, but it needs to be upgraded. It was written a long time ago and society has changed greatly. We need to re write it so it fits into our lives today.

I believe that the accusations Jason has made are completely erroneous. Where does he come off stating his opinion in such a manner to where it is almost offensive. We understand that everyone is entitled to their opinion but please calm down. I can see where you might have put some thought into your response but seriously, tone it down. Now, that being said, you are wrong. Completely and whole-heartedly wrong.

The constitution may be outdated but it still holds the country together. I agree with Dj it does need to be re written and needs to be adjusted to fit todays lifestyle.

That's a little harsh i'm a nice guy there was no offense intended.

okay on to the fact that i just tried to post this two minutes ago and it stated that there was submission error and i didn't bother to copy what i posted. so now i'm going to free hand this one. The united states constitution is not outdated, for it to be outdated that would entitle that fact that it was made just for that time era for instance if they said that a person has the right to speak for there horse for they can't talk. then yes it would be outdated but its not based on a certain time period it is based on the ideals of honesty and justice for all men everywhere. that is why this document will never be outdated and sure maybe it needs to be updated or adjusted but thats because our founding fathers didn't see this pro